“Alternative Facts,” No!
Dada Data, Yes!
Porridger’s Almanack (Breakfast of Ganglions)
On 28 Apr 2020 Chris Voss at WCRB informed us of the program for that night’s instalment of “Festival 1750” [The broadcast festival featured music created immediately before and after the pivotal year of 1750, when the elaborate vibrancy of Baroque masters Bach and Handel began to give way to the grace and proportions of composers like Haydn and Mozart.]
But did not explain why the program includes the Beethoven 7th Symphony (composed in 1813) nor even the Mozart Clarinet Concerto (composed in 1791) . . . not that it is Chris’s fault.
Tuesday night I rewatched Blade Runner 2049. When it came out I gave it a wide miss. My prejudice was not deeply ingrained nor was it especially strong, but it was completely ill-founded. At last, however, my native curiosity prevailed and I did actually watch it,.I find it an excellent slowburn and as beautiful to watch as the original. The score plugs into the Vangelis vibe, too. Entirely predictably, I love Edward James Olmos’ return as Gaff, and I am delighted that this screenplay also is by Hampton Fancher. I don’t believe I had previously made the connection that this was the same director (Denis Villeneuve) who is doing the new Dune movies. As to the latter, I enjoyed Part I without being besotted with it. I suppose that my not being a great fan of Herbert’s source novel is related to my not finding anything greatly disappointing in the old David Lynch movie. I haven’t yet watched Part II, but neither am I strenuously avoiding it. I’m walking to the Library today, perhaps I’ll check Pt II out.
And so last night I revisited Ridley Scott’s original, still gorgeous to the eye. Probably unsurprising: the new movie imparts an interesting “pre-echo” to the final scenes of Deckard finding Rachael in his apartment and leaving with her. These days I speak exclusively in terms of Ridley Scott’s Final Cut, for which I am richly grateful. Back when there still a Borders on Washington Street in Boston (that used to be a bookstore chain, by the way) I bought a discounted DVD of Blade Runner. I wound up returning it unopened as my subconscious was pricked to do some investigating, and I learnt that the Final Cut edition was imminent. I found the Dangerous Days documentary on YouTube (it seems to have dropped off since) and my Blade Runner Fever was really pitched up. To shift gears only slightly, Terry Gilliam’s brilliant Brazil (another dystopian classic) fell afoul of the Studio, which edited it into what Gilliam wrily dubbed a Love Conquers All version. Gilliam waged a PR war and won. To return to Blade Runner, Scott was compelled to make similarly-motivated modifications. Deckard eloped with Rachael and we see outtake landscapes from Stanley Kubrick’s helicopter shoot for The Shining, and we have grandfatherly voice-overs not only “explaining” that romantic escape, but upstaging Rutger Hauer’s touching rooftop soliloquy which concludes the film’s drama. Decades had passed since I watched the film in the cinema but I recalled (notwithstanding my overall white-hot enthusiasm for the movie) rolling my eyes, albeit only to myself. The Final Cut restores Deckard’s dream of a unicorn. The origami unicorn that Gaff left outside Deckard’s apartment thus suggests not only that Deckard is himself a replicant, but that Gaff is aware of that fact, and that his LAPD colleagues are leaving him and Rachael be. Deckard thus has the question he had posed to Tyrell (How can it not know what it is?!) turned back upon himself. Atop the discovery which astonished those in the BR 2049 lab, that a replicant could bear a child) we have the related puzzle that Deckard was created capable of inseminating a partner, and Tyrell (apparently) so designed them (Deckard and Rachael both.)
The novelty of returning to Scott’s original last night was having the following sink in: Deckard asks Zhora for leave to check her dressing room for “Little, uh, dirty holes they uh, drill in the wall so they can watch a lady undress.” And then we see Joanna Cassidy in the shower. The echo of Hitchcock’s Psycho impressed itself on me so strongly last night, I near wondered I had missed it before. Deliberate on Ridley Scott’s part or serendipity?
Entirely separarely, I am slow-reading The Beatles Anthology. The experience is reminding me that at the time of my first descent into the Beatles rabbithole, I did read two books dedicated to them so, as with the DVD Anthology, it is a mix of some few factoids of which I was already aware, and a wealth of new info.